Social Ecological Impact of Irrawaddy Hydropower Project
Should it be continued?
Paragraph I: Introduction
Overview
Idea 1: Where and what is Irrawaddy? How important is Irrawaddy in Burmese life?
Idea 2: Overview of dam project: who, aim, cooperation, location, size
Paragraph II: advantages
Idea 1: employment opportunity
2600 job opportunities –
Comment 1, very minor
Idea 2, foreign currency from sale of electricity
Comment 1, in what sector and how it will be used?
Comment 2, any transparency to show it benefits the public sectors?
Idea 3, increasing power availability locally
Comment 1, how much proportion of total?
Comment 2, any allocation decided?
Idea 4, Improve relationship
Comment 1 counter economic sanctions and get a back-up in UN?
Comment 2, mutual benefits.
Comment 3, care for people or just political game?
Paragraph III: disadvantages
Idea 1, effect on navigation system,
Link 1 to size, Comment 1, several islands appearing,
Comment 2, changes in flow path and bank erosion, comment 4, more gorges may appear. All comments resulting in navigation lock
Idea 2 effect on irrigation
Link 1 to idea 1 and Link 2 to size, Comment 1, smaller floodplain
Comment 2, a large body of sea water may sweep inland at the river mouth,
Comment 3, resulting in soil quality degradation,
Comment 3, big negative social and economical impact since Burma is an agricultural land.
Idea 3 effect of contamination
Link 1 to aim, many gold mines along Irrawaddy river bank with waste thrown directly into the river.
Comment 1, river will be contaminated by wastes from construction works and gold mine.
Comment 2, result in degradation of freshwater species, which is a main food supply for most Burmese.
Comment 3, including the Irrawaddy dolphin which is a rare species, lower tourism income
Idea 4 force dislocation
Link 1 to size, mass dislocation by force one of the most serious human right abuses.
Comment 1, result in more intense public disbelief in the government,
Comment 2, more tensions between KIO and the government
Paragraph IV: conclusions
Idea 1, advantages overweighs.
Comment 1, Burmese government should be more transparent while both governments should be more responsible for the social and ecological lives.
Comment 2, before proceeding, there should be a complete review of the project with a lot of negotiations with local people and dialogue with all parties such as environmentalists, political oppositions concerning the long life of Irrawaddy.
No comments:
Post a Comment